New movie theater for Durant is still in the picture
by Jamie Carrick, staff writer
5 months ago | 2257 views | 6 6 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Although some Durant City Council members may have questions regarding a Durant Industrial Authority loan for a proposed new theater, the project is continuing as planned, due to a recent ruling from City Attorney Pat Phelps.

On March 9, the DIA approved a $500,000 loan, which would include two parts — $250,000 for 25 years at zero interest paid back monthly and a $250,000 loan that is forgiven if theater ticket sales reach 100,000 per each of the first 10 years, which would generate sales of $700,000 and provide Durant sales tax value of $31,000 annually.

The new state-of-the-art theater, which would be located on a 4.2 acre site south of University, will have an estimated investment of $4.5 million for land, building and equipment.

In a March 9 Durant City Council meeting, council members tabled the matter and asked the DIA to reevaluate the loan agreement with B&B Theatres and Rupe Development.

In a message to Tommy Kramer, executive director of the DIA, Phelps wrote on March 10 that he reviewed the DIA trust indenture and its supplements and “conversed with other Oklahoma lawyers who deal solely in the field of public finances.”

According to the message, the trust indenture allows the DIA “to provide funds for the cost of financing, refinancing, acquiring, constructing or purchasing” properties for the purpose of economic development.

Thus, a motion by the city council is not necessary in order to pursue the loan agreement. If the ruling had been required, the DIA would have honored the council’s opinion either way, Durant Mayor Jerry Tomlinson said.

The attorney’s opinion about the necessity of the vote would have been preferred before the council meeting because it would have eliminated confusion among the council members, Tomlinson said. During the meeting, council member Bobby Story asked many times if the council even needed to make a ruling on the DIA’s decision.

During the council meeting, Vice Mayor Tom Marcum said the large loan is unprecedented because the DIA has never given loan funds to for-profit private retail groups in the past unless they brought a large number of jobs and sales tax value.

“We have never chosen economic development funds for entertainment venues,” Marcum said. However, public funds have been given to not-for-profit venues.

Kramer spoke to the council, saying that the loan was approved on the basis that it is subject to a bankable loan.

John Rupe Sr. with Rupe Development is seeking a loan with First United Bank being the lead bank and wants other Durant banks to participate in the loan. Rural Enterprises would package the business loan with a SBA-504 loan program with the local banks.

Tomlinson said the theater group is still working with local banks on the finance end of the project. Once that process is complete, the bank loans will be a basis for the DIA loan.

Approximately $4 million of the funds will come from financial institutions. The finances could be completed in several weeks, Tomlinson said.

In regards to the $500,000 DIA loan, Tomlinson said he would not describe the amount as “big,” but rather the amount necessary to make the project a viable option for everyone involved.

Other theater groups have not been interested in coming to the Durant area, Tomlinson said, and B&B Theatres is the 20th largest theater group in the nation.

Kramer said the company has hired professional engineering and architect firms for the project, and final conceptual plans and designs could be complete soon, possibly in 60 days.

Once engineering and design blueprints are complete, they must be brought to city officials to make sure they meet Durant building codes, Kramer said.

The theater company approached the city in 2007, saying they had surveyed the market and saw the leakage of movie patrons that Durant was experiencing, Kramer said.

When asked why the project has taken three years to come to the forefront, Kramer said the occurrence is not uncommon. He worked with Chili’s between five and six years and worked for 10-plus years to bring a new Braum’s to Durant.

Kramer stressed that the funds used for the loan will come from a non-sales tax fund used for economic development projects. More than $500,000 is currently in the account, he said.

The DIA studied and reviewed the funding options for the project and decided that using the economic fund was the best option, Kramer said.

Tomlinson said part of the funds for the account comes from members of the original industrial foundation that was in place before the DIA.

When the DIA was founded in 1964, Kramer said the funds from the foundation were transferred over into a special account, which was to be used for economic development projects.

Kramer said the DIA has waited to use the funds on an economic project Durant citizens would stand behind. Because the DIA was founded 46 years ago, he is unsure if a portion of the funds have been used for past projects.

The new theater is expected to employ 20-25 part-time employees and two to three full-time management positions. It would have eight theaters, with the largest seating 238 patrons and the smallest seating a little under 100.

Tomlinson said citizens have been been excited about the project and he has heard people ask if the theater is still coming to the area.

Kramer said he is unaware of opponents to the project and that the reaction has been overwhelmingly positive. Also, he feels that the theater will have a positive effect on other retail businesses in the community.

“I’ve never seen so much excitement from the citizens about a project [before],” Kramer said.

A new theater has been the No. 1 request from citizens, he said, and additional restaurants is a close second.

Rene Lemons, general manager of the Durant Twin Cinema and Bowling Center, disagrees with the funding plan for the new theater, saying that Jerry and Ann Wann did not receive any financial help from the city when they opened Durant Twin Cinema in 1993.

“The city officials want to give them a loan. Jerry had to do it on his own,” she said at the DIA meeting in March, adding that the loan proposal for the outside company is like a “stab in the back.”

Before the vote, Lemons asked why the Mr. Wann was not approached about upgrading and renovating the Durant Twin Cinema

Addressing the policy question, Kramer said that projects come to the city in a multi-facet of ways and in that the DIA does not approach businesses. Rather, businesses approach them with project ideas.

He said that local businesses are more than welcome to approach the DIA with projects.

The DIA’s job is to improve the workforce in the community and help businesses, Kramer said.
comments (6)
« weneednewtheater wrote on Wednesday, Apr 14 at 11:10 AM »
The $31,000 in revenue per year is a small amount but the way I see it, that is money that will be spent here rather than given to Texas businesses. The reason that I have no problem with my tax dollars going to the new theater is when you look at the big picture, there is more potential profit for this area. I truly believe if we have more entertainment here large chain resturaunts and shops would be inclined to open businesses in this area. I think the DIA has the ulimate goal of increasing overall revenue by keeping Southern Oklahoma resident's money here!!
« Taxpayer2 wrote on Tuesday, Apr 13 at 10:38 AM »
Weneednewtheater: I completely agree about the benefits of a new theater in Durant. I would agree that possibly the owners of the current theater have not managed their business in a way that could compete with a new theater - My problem with this issue has nothing to do with having a new theater in town. My issue is using tax dollars to fund a private business that will give very little in return. As Marcum pointed out in the council meeting, the City would not even offer these incentives to Lowes. And he also pointed out that $31,000/year in sales tax revenue is peanuts. Therefore, the return on investment is minimal at best. If a theater wants to come to town, let them do so - at their expense.

I would also suggest people stop to think why this is so important to city officials? Why the secrecy? Why not put it out for a vote? Why push for something so hard that promises to deliver very little (on the surface)? Maybe we need to figure out what is truly behind this decision. Once again - I ask the Durant Democrat to DO ITS JOB - investigative journalism - watchdog for the citizens.
« GUFFAW wrote on Monday, Apr 12 at 10:27 PM »
Somebody explain how this works! Who do these people think they are, the DISD administration? Oligarchic corporate rule---- even in Durant?! How about this--- the city council manages the police, roads and utilities in the most efficient and effective manner as their talents allow and the marketplace will either create a demand for a new theater, or it won't. And local banks will decide if the venture is worth the risk, and the depositors will decide if the bank is making a prudent loan or not by deciding whether or not to trust the bank with their money? Wouldn't that be a unique way to approach things? But, that wouldn't let the Masters play their little games with other peoples money, and what would they do with their time? No, we are just now playing the games that began in CA two or three decades ago, and look how well that is working out for them right now....

And if the fund is from non sales tax source--- I assume it originated from some public source--- it sure sounds like sales taxes are going to be used as an enticement, right? Let's concentrate on bringing something really useful to town, like another bio diesel plant. That's the sort of business government excels in.
« weneednewtheater wrote on Monday, Apr 12 at 01:24 PM »
As a tax payer that LOVES going to the theater, I can say that we definitely need a new one in this town. I refuse to take my children into the Durant Twin Cinema. I (along with lots of others) use to go there rather than driving to Sherman, however, it became apparent in the first 7-10 years that none of the money I was spending was being put back into the business. It has been in business for 17 years and still has the same broke down dirty seats, cracked screens, and out of date audio. I am quite sure there are still spills on that dirty sticky floor from 1999. I know that they have had to of made quite a profit in 17 years and probably could have recieved an improvment loan but chose to do neither. I am so excited about the thought of a new theater and keeping my money in Bryan county instead of spending it in Texas. And the twin cinema could always become a $1 theater....
« FloydR wrote on Monday, Apr 12 at 06:53 AM »
Whoaaaa...Mr. Kramer expects me to believe that the industrial foundation had a half million in unused funds in 1964? Even if it were a quarter million and had been sitting in interest bearing accounts that he and his predecessors would have been able to keep their paws off that money for 46 years?
« Taxpayer2 wrote on Sunday, Apr 11 at 09:02 AM »
There are so many things in this story that highlight total fraud and deception by City of Durant officials. First and foremost, what is a "non-sales tax fund"? Are these donations from private citizens? I would hope the Democrat would do a bit of investigation (ie it's job) to inform the taxpayers where this money comes from.

It also appears that the city attorney was pressured to come up with a way for this deal to get done. In essence what Phelps is telling the citizens of Durant is that DIA can do whatever it would like to do with OUR money. This protects the members on the council - no public vote that would allow each one to be held accountable. Sound familiar? This same approach is used in Washington DC. The city council should stand up and say it does not matter how things are done elsewhere - what matters is we will do the right thing - and that means being transparent. However, since the city is being led by a professional politician, we should expect nothing less.

Tomlison saying $500,000 is not "big"? And this man wants to run for office? If you opened up city hall to any local business who would like to have $500,000 for expansion, capital improvements, etc, the place would be over-run. Tomlison's statement highlights the elitist mentality that is rampant among city officials. If spent with some common sense, that money could create more than a few part-time positions and results greater than $31,000/year.

I hope the citizens of Durant will take a long hard look at how these officials are conducting themselves. It is shameful for them to believe we will just continue to turn a blind eye and let them line their own pockets with projects that benefit them personally. I would urge the staff at the Democrat to remember what it's job is - not to report only what you're told to print - but do INFORM the public - to be a watchdog on behalf of the citizens and taxpayers.

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: